When autocomplete results are available use up and down arrows to review and enter to select.
Title | Recipient | Date |
---|---|---|
Joint Trades Opposition Letter to Credit Card Rate Cap Amendment | 05/21/25 | |
Joint Trades Letter to Congress on Credit Card Competition Act Amendment | 05/21/25 | |
ICBA Letter to Senate Ahead of GENIUS Act Stablecoin Vote | U.S. Senate | 05/16/25 |
ICBA Letter on April 2 House Financial Services Committee Markup | House Financial Services Committee | 04/01/25 |
Statement for the Record of Digital Assets Hearing | 02/26/25 | |
Statement for Digital Assets Hearing | 02/11/25 | |
Joint Trades Opposition Letter to 10 Percent Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Act | 02/05/25 | |
Joint Letter Supporting Senate Secure Payments Act of 2024 | Sen. Ted Budd | 06/19/24 |
ICBA Letter Supporting HR 5403 | U.S. House of Representatives | 05/21/24 |
Joint Trades Letter Opposing Credit Card Price Control Bill | Sen. Josh Hawley | 09/20/23 |
Title | Recipient | Date |
---|---|---|
Letter to Nacha on International ACH Transactions | 05/30/25 | |
Letter to Nacha on ACH Proposals | 12/16/24 | |
Letter urging CFPB to clarify Regulation Z interpretive rule on Buy Now, Pay Later Loans | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | 08/01/24 |
Request for 90-Day Comment Extension on Expanding Fedwire | 06/11/24 | |
ICBA Comments on Reg II Debit Card Interchange Proposal | Federal Reserve | 05/11/24 |
Comments on Basel Cryptoasset Standard Amendments | Basel Committee on Banking Supervision | 03/28/24 |
Freedom of Information Act Request on CBDC Authority | Federal Reserve, Justice Department, Treasury Department | 03/22/24 |
Joint Trade Statement on ISO 20022 Standards | BIS Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures | 02/28/24 |
Disclosure of Cryptoasset Exposures | Letter to Regulators | 01/30/24 |
ICBA Comment Letter for FinCEN Cryptocurrency Mixer Proposal | FinCEN | 01/23/24 |
Title | Committee | Presenter | Date |
---|---|---|---|
ICBA Statement for STABLE Act Markup | House Financial Services Committee | Written Statement | 04/01/25 |
Community Bank Statement for GENIUS Act Markup | Senate Banking Committee | Written Statement | 03/12/25 |
Statement for House Hearing on Central Bank Digital Currency Risks | House Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion | Written Statement | 09/13/23 |
Effective Regulation of Crypto Assets | Senate Banking Committee | Written Statement | 02/13/23 |
Statement for Senate Crypto Hearing | Senate Banking Committee | Written Statement | 07/28/22 |
Hearing Statement on Central Bank Digital Currency | House Financial Services Committee | Written statement | 05/25/22 |
Enhanced Regulation of Digital Assets Will Promote Responsible Innovation | Senate Banking Hearing | 02/15/22 | |
Statement for House Hearing on Stablecoins | House Financial Services Committee | Written statement | 02/08/22 |
Statement for Senate Stablecoin Hearing | Senate Banking Committee | Written Statement | 12/14/21 |
Statement for House Hearing on Digital Assets | House Financial Services Committee | Written statement | 12/07/21 |
ICBA Statement for HFSC Fintech Hearing 9-29-2020 | HSFC | 09/29/20 |
Feb. 21, 2023
The Bank for International Settlements issued a report to help central banks extend operating hours for real-time gross settlement systems to reduce delays in cross-border payments settlement.
Report Details: The report from BIS’s Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures says extending and aligning RTGS operating hours could speed up cross-border payments, especially between jurisdictions with significant time zone differences. It could also improve liquidity management, reduce settlement risk, enhance performance, and facilitate cheaper and more transparent cross-border payments in line with G20 targets, the report says.
Background: Slow and inefficient cross-border payments are frequently cited as a justification for a U.S. central bank digital currency and stablecoins. So the evolution of traditional RTGS systems could play a role in the potential development of CBDCs and other digital assets.
ICBA Position: ICBA opposes the creation of a U.S. CBDC, arguing that it would disintermediate community banks and pose privacy risks without improving on superior payment alternatives, such as FedNow. ICBA in September released polling conducted by Morning Consult indicating consumers support a regulatory framework for digital assets and are skeptical of the creation of a U.S. CBDC.
Recent Congressional Statement: In a written statement for a Senate Banking Committee hearing last week on crypto oversight, ICBA laid out the risks posed by stablecoins and decentralized finance while reiterating its push for comprehensive and coordinated crypto regulations that avoid dangerous loopholes.