When autocomplete results are available use up and down arrows to review and enter to select.
ICBA has serious concerns regarding threats posed by cryptocurrency to privacy and to consumers, and financial stability resulting from increases in money laundering, terrorist financing, and fraudulent activity.
Unregulated cryptocurrency threatens to disintermediate community banks and undermine their ability to provide funding to support local economic activity, growth, and development.
Cryptocurrencies have a history replete with volatile price swings, hacks, and exploits. ICBA cautions policymakers that strategic reserves of cryptocurrencies may lose value and lead to unknown risks for the US economy.
ICBA urges policymakers to ensure public trust by fostering collaboration between domestic and international regulatory authorities to mitigate risks as the adoption of cryptocurrency continues to increase.
ICBA supports ongoing efforts by policymakers to harmonize regulations to ensure strong, clear, and consistent oversight of cryptocurrency service providers and establish guidelines for any permissible activities by banks.
ICBA believes most cryptoassets are likely offered and sold as unregistered securities. Therefore, crypto entities should be subject to relevant securities laws and regulations. ICBA supports the efforts of the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission to apply the securities framework to cryptoassets and related entities.
ICBA urges policymakers, regulators, law enforcement, and national security organizations to coordinate their efforts to combat ransomware and prevent bad actors from using cryptocurrencies for illicit activities and investment scams.
ICBA encourages regulators to collaborate on a comprehensive approach to prevent the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi), a shadow banking system filled with unregulated, decentralized platforms that pose risks to consumers, the financial system, and U.S. national security.
Stablecoin issuers should not have access to Federal Reserve master accounts or the payments system.
Special purpose bank charters or similar alternatives should not be granted to crypto entities that do not fully meet the requirements of federally insured and supervised chartered banks.
Regulatory frameworks must establish strong federal oversight for stablecoin issuers to prevent a regulatory race to the bottom.
Any regulatory or supervisory regime applicable to nonbank issued stablecoins should be comparable to a functionally similar product offered by a bank or other traditional financial services provider. This will ensure risks created by loosely regulated nonbank firms do not spill over into the traditional banking system.
The separation of banking and commerce must be preserved by ensuring commercial firms are not given the significant power of issuing private currency.
ICBA is concerned about the potential development of state-issued stablecoins that could negatively impact deposits at community banks, thereby harming their ability to provide credit to their communities. If states create new forms of money or payment systems, the U.S. financial system could experience significant fragmentation, threatening financial stability.
ICBA urges policymakers to engage with community banks as the Federal Reserve begins to explore new tokenization systems.
The cryptocurrency industry has demonstrated continued growth despite large-scale malfeasance and lawsuits against significant players. Community bankers remain concerned about the risks presented by digital assets, including rampant investment scams and a lack of strong consumer protections and regulatory oversight. In particular, bankers are becoming increasingly concerned about the growing potential of digital assets to jeopardize the financial stability of the traditional banking sector.
Bankers remain unconvinced that stablecoins are the “silver bullet” for cross-border payments. In fact, the global financial system may be disrupted if stablecoins become widely adopted for payments. ICBA urges policymakers to develop a consistent regulatory framework for stablecoins that addresses the risks they pose to the wider financial system, establishes strong federal oversight to prevent charter arbitrage, preserves the separation of banking and commerce, and ensures that issuers do not have access to Federal Reserve master accounts. Addressing these complex issues will require collaboration with international partners to resolve critical regulatory, legal, technical and governance questions.
DeFi, a growing ecosystem of financial applications that run on public blockchains, also threatens to disintermediate community banks and create a shadow banking system filled with unregulated platforms that pose risks to consumers, the financial system, and U.S. national security. Any regulatory regime applied to cryptocurrency should be comparable to the multitude of regulations applicable to functionally similar products and services offered by the traditional financial system.
Cryptocurrencies also have a long history of being used for illicit activities. North Korea continues to steal and launder billions of dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency to circumvent U.S. sanctions and advance its weapons of mass destruction program. The broader use of cryptocurrency, without accompanying regulation or oversight, allows financial crimes and threats to national security to proliferate. Therefore, protecting national security and implementing anti-crime measures should be primary drivers of cryptocurrency policymaking and regulation. ICBA strongly supports regulatory efforts to curtail the use of cryptocurrency mixers and anonymity-enhanced cryptocurrencies.
June 18, 2025
ICBA pledged to continue working with Congress on legislation to establish a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins following Tuesday’s 68-30 bipartisan Senate vote to pass the GENIUS Act (S. 1582).
About the Bill: The GENIUS Act outlines requirements for payment stablecoin issuance by banks and nonbanks, including reserve and AML/BSA requirements, to establish a federal regulatory framework for the largely unregulated stablecoin market.
ICBA Response: In a national news release following the vote, ICBA said it appreciates the Senate’s efforts to address community banker concerns with the bill to protect against the negative economic consequences that would result from community bank disintermediation. “ICBA understands the importance of having a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins and has worked closely with the Senate to incorporate critical guardrails to protect consumers and our payments system,” ICBA President and CEO Rebeca Romero Rainey said. “As the House determines how it will consider stablecoin legislation, ICBA looks forward to continuing to work with the House to ensure it is further strengthened to address community banker concerns so that the measure fully protects the role community banks serve in local communities across America.”
ICBA Advocacy: Throughout the debate, ICBA has worked closely with lawmakers to ensure the bill includes key community bank priorities. As a follow-up to community banker advocacy on stablecoin legislation during ICBA’s Capital Summit, ICBA urged senators to ensure the bill includes needed guardrails against community bank disintermediation, including in a recent letter. ICBA previously urged the Senate to ensure the act provides regulatory clarity while protecting against community bank disintermediation before voting on the measure.
Key Policies: To address community bank concerns with the bill, ICBA has repeatedly said the legislation must:
Not permit nonbank stablecoin issuers to obtain Federal Reserve Master Accounts.
Prohibit yield-bearing payment stablecoins and ensure the intent of the legislation cannot be evaded by offering other similar incentives.
Effectively limit permissible payment stablecoin issuer activities.
Prevent big tech firms from leveraging stablecoins to exploit the payments system, posing risks to consumers and the safety of the financial system.
Progress on the Bill: ICBA’s advocacy has resulted in positive changes to the bill throughout the legislative process, including strengthening language on Federal Reserve master account access, expanding the prohibition on yield/interest-bearing stablecoins to include other financial considerations, limiting nonfinancial publicly traded companies' ability to issue stablecoins, tightening permissible activities of issuers, and ensuring issuers cannot claim stablecoins are FDIC insured.
Outlook: With passage of stablecoin legislation a top priority of President Donald Trump, the House will now determine whether to take up the GENIUS Act, work out key differences with its own bill—the STABLE Act (H.R. 2392)—or package it with crypto market structure legislation. ICBA will continue working with lawmakers to address outstanding areas of concern, such as ensuring final legislation does not violate the longstanding U.S. policy of maintaining the separation of banking and commerce.