Skip to Main Content
ICBA
ICBA
  • Member Login
  • Member Login

Tax Policy

Community Bank Access to Capital

Since 2007, the public capital markets have often been either unavailable or unattractive to many community banks and holding companies. Community banks have had to rely more on existing shareholders, directors and insiders for capital raises and less on new investors, including institutions and private equity investors.

Related Topics: Regulatory Capital Example Text De Novo Community Bank Formation Example Text View All Topics
Money on desk
Capital Building

Take Action Today

Help advocate for community banking by writing a letter to congress.

Take Action  Example Text
people working together

Join the ICBA Community

Explore the ICBA Community to see discussions on this and other issues.

Join the Conversation Example Text

Position & Background

  • ICBA supports legislative and regulatory changes that would improve the ability of community banks to raise capital.
  • ICBA opposes the inequitable capital treatment of community banks, based solely on corporate structure, for banks participating in economic stimulus programs such as the Emergency Capital Investment Program. Subchapter S banks should receive the same capital treatment as Subchapter C banks when participating in economic stimulus programs designed to increase capital investments in local communities.
  • The asset threshold under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) for requiring an annual audit should be raised from $500 million to $1 billion, and the asset threshold for an internal control report, also required by FDICIA, should be raised from $1 billion to $5 billion.
  • SEC Regulation D should be revised so that the definition of an “accredited investor” includes individuals with a net worth of $1 million or more, including their primary residence.
  • ICBA is supportive of additional upward adjustments to the asset limits under the Federal Reserve’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement to ensure these thresholds remain current and properly align with industry consolidation trends.

Since 2007, the public capital markets have often been either unavailable or unattractive to many community banks and holding companies. Community banks have had to rely more on existing shareholders, directors and insiders for capital raises and less on new investors, including institutions and private equity investors.

Additionally, expensive regulations, such as FDICIA, deter community banks from growth, by requiring banks above a certain asset size to incur greater regulatory costs. These regulations, which have not been updated in decades, were intended to apply to only some community banks but now capture many more community banks due to outdated asset thresholds.

Letters & Testimonies

Showing 1 to 6 of 18

ICBA Expert Contacts

Jenna Burke

Jenna Burke

Executive Vice President, General Counsel Government Relations & Public Policy
Contact Expert Example Text

Articles

ICBA issues new white paper calling on policymakers to close ILC loophole

ICBA published a new white paper detailing why policymakers should close the industrial loan company loophole, which allows ILCs and their parent companies to skirt regulatory oversight, endangering consumers and the economy.

11/13/25  | 

New ICBA White Paper Calls on Policymakers to Close Industrial Loan Company Loophole

The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) today released a comprehensive white paper detailing why policymakers should close a legal loophole that allows industrial loan companies and their parent companies to skirt regulatory oversight, endangering consumers and the economy.

11/12/25  | 

Showing 1 to 3 of 9