Bank Secrecy Act and Enforcement


  • ICBA strongly urges Congress, the Treasury, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and state and federal regulators to find and timely implement solutions for reducing community banks’ mounting costs and regulatory burdens associated with compliance with anti-money laundering and terrorist financing laws and regulations.
  • ICBA recommends that community banks be compensated for their anti-money laundering and anti- terrorist financing oversight and policing activities on behalf of the government either through tax credits or other financial compensation or through reduced regulatory burden in other areas.
  • ICBA strongly supports Treasury’s efforts to develop risk-based examinations for Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance and identify low risk transactions and accounts.
  • ICBA urges the federal government to better inform bankers of what specific methods of terrorist financing and money laundering they are trying to prevent.
  • ICBA supports the collection of beneficial ownership information by the appropriate government agency at the time an entity is formed.
  • ICBA recommends that nonbank institutions that perform “bank-like” functions and offer comparable financial services be subject to the same anti-money laundering and BSA laws and regulations as banks.
  • ICBA encourages the federal government to develop a single comprehensive watch-list for terrorists.


Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Requirements Should Be Flexible and Easily Applied. ICBA supports FinCEN’s efforts to simplify certain BSA forms and encourages the government to continue streamlining other reporting requirements. The federal government should continue working with the banking industry to provide additional guidance—such as best practices, questions and answers, or commentary—that is understandable, workable and easily applied by community banks. ICBA encourages FinCEN to continue its investigation and adaptation of technology to assist banks with their BSA compliance requirements. ICBA also encourages the Office of Foreign Asset Control to streamline and simplify its lists for ease of reference and application by bankers.

As the government continues to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, it is important to focus on quality over quantity for all BSA reporting. To ensure a consistent and balanced effort to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, the federal government should have consistent regulations across all financial services providers including nonbank entities. Additionally, the government should require reporting of only truly suspect transactions—and strive to balance those requirements against the need to respect customer privacy.

Compensation for Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Efforts. Community bankers are committed to supporting balanced, effective measures that will prevent terrorists from using the financial system to fund their operations and prevent money launderers from hiding the proceeds of criminal activities. However, as the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) identifies additional high risk transactions and accounts, it increases banks’ requirements in these new areas. For community banks, BSA compliance represents a significant expense in terms of both direct and indirect costs. BSA compliance, whatever the benefit to society at large, is a governmental, law enforcement function. As such, the costs should be borne by the government. ICBA supports the creation of a tax credit to offset the cost of BSA compliance.

Communication Among Industry, Law Enforcement and the Federal Government is Critical. Communication and cooperation are critical to an effective working partnership among the government, law enforcement, and financial institutions. Community banks seek more current information from the federal government to better understand what specific methods of terrorist financing and money laundering they are trying to prevent. With this understanding, bankers can supply information more efficiently and obtain better results for law enforcement.

Beneficial Ownership. Beneficial ownership information should be collected and verified at the time a legal entity is formed. Collecting and verifying the identity of all natural person owners of each entity by either the Internal Revenue Service or other appropriate federal agency and/or state in which the entity is formed would provide uniformity and consistency across the United States. Making the formation of an entity contingent on receiving beneficial owner information would create a strong incentive for equity owners and investors to provide such information. Additionally, periodic renewal of an entity’s state registration would provide an efficient and effective vehicle for updating beneficial ownership information. If such information is housed at a government entity, community banks should have access to it.

Staff Contact: Lilly Thomas