Payments

Letters and Testimonies

Letters to Congress

Title Recipient Date
Sen. Josh Hawley 09/20/23
House Financial Services Committee 09/19/23
House Financial Services Committee 07/19/23
House, Senate Leaders 07/14/23
House, Senate 07/11/23
House Financial Services Committee 06/13/23
Senate, House leaders 06/09/23
House Financial Services Committee 05/05/23
House Financial Services Committee 04/19/23
Rep. Tom Emmer 03/08/23
Senate, House 11/17/22
House, Senate 10/11/22
Senate 10/04/22
House 09/27/22
House 09/21/22
Senate 08/31/22
House Financial Services Committee 07/22/22
Senate Judiciary Committee 05/04/22
Senate Judiciary Committee 05/02/22
Sens. Cruz, Braun, Grassley 04/04/22
Rep. Tom Emmer 04/04/22
Congress 07/27/21
116th Congress 10/15/20
U.S. House Task Force on Financial Technology 09/29/20

Letters to Regulators

Title Recipient Date
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 03/28/24
Federal Reserve, Justice Department, Treasury Department 03/22/24
BIS Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures 02/28/24
Letter to Regulators 01/30/24
FinCEN 01/23/24
Federal Reserve 11/27/23
IRS 11/13/23
Federal Reserve 10/20/23
IOSCO 10/18/23
White House, Treasury Department 10/12/23

Testimony

Title Committee Presenter Date
House Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion Written Statement 09/13/23
Senate Banking Committee Written Statement 02/13/23
Senate Banking Committee Written Statement 07/28/22
House Financial Services Committee Written statement 05/25/22
Senate Banking Hearing 02/15/22
House Financial Services Committee Written statement 02/08/22
Senate Banking Committee Written Statement 12/14/21
House Financial Services Committee Written statement 12/07/21
HSFC 09/29/20

Payments News

Lawmakers echo ICBA’s CBDC concerns during hearing

May 27, 2022

Members of Congress from both parties raised concerns about the impact of a U.S. central bank digital currency on community banks after ICBA told lawmakers it opposes the digital dollar.

Congressional Concerns: During a House Financial Services Committee hearing on the benefits and risks of a CBDC, several committee members raised questions reflecting ICBA concerns about the community bank impact.

  • Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) raised concerns that a CBDC would reduce bank deposits, particularly among community banks, decreasing funding for home and business loans.

  • Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) emphasized that even an intermediated CBDC system would result in deposits exiting community banks and the broader banking system.

  • Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) questioned why a bank would have any incentive to take CBDC deposits if they are a liability of the Federal Reserve and there’s no way to lend against them.

  • Ranking Member Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) questioned whether a CBDC provides any benefits that cannot be delivered by the private sector.

Arguments in Favor: Nevertheless, some policymakers indicated support for a U.S. CBDC.

  • Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said a U.S. digital dollar could provide the benefits promised by cryptocurrency without the risks posed by private issuers.

  • The sole witness—Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard—similarly said the digitalization of the financial system and private-sector risks could necessitate a U.S. CBDC, touting the “intermediated” model the Fed is considering.

ICBA Statement: In its statement for the hearing, ICBA reiterated key points from its recent comment letter to the Fed that a a U.S. CBDC would:

  • Disintermediate community banks, obstructing their ability to take deposits and make loans.

  • Be costly for community banks.

  • Pose privacy and cybersecurity risks.

  • Not be an alternative to privately issued stablecoins.

Better Alternatives: ICBA’s statement also says the FedNow instant payment service is a more viable solution for payments modernization that complements increased Same Day ACH adoption and The Clearing House’s RTP service.

READ MORE