ICBA - Advocacy - ICBA Policy Resolutions for 2016<br>Track 1: Legislation and Regulation

ICBA Policy Resolutions for 2016
Track 1: Legislation and Regulation



  • ICBA opposes any prohibitions on the ability of community banks to classify mortgage loans and investment securities at amortized cost when the bank’s intent is to collect contractual cash flows.
  • ICBA supports the work of the Financial Accounting Foundation’s Private Company Council to seek recognition, measurement, and disclosure alternatives for smaller private companies including non-public community banks.
  • When accounting standards are developed, provisions should be made for smaller financial institutions and businesses so that the cost of implementing the standards does not outweigh their benefit to financial statement users.
  • ICBA opposes the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (FASB) operating lease proposal which would require balance sheet recognition of long-term operating leases for both lessors and lessees.
  • ICBA opposes the FASB’s proposed disclosures regarding liquidity and interest rate risk for community banks.
  • ICBA strongly opposes FASB’s proposed current expected credit loss (CECL) model for community bank loans and investment securities. (See separate priority resolution on this topic.)


Recognition and Measurement. ICBA opposes restrictions on the ability of community banks to classify mortgage loans and investment securities at amortized cost under the FASB’s proposed recognition and measurement provisions of the financial instruments project. The alternative to amortized cost, fair value, is based on the exit price of a loan or security, which current fair value guidance defines as the price at which a willing buyer and seller would transact for that asset in a non-distressed market. Carrying financial instruments such as loans and securities at fair value creates a tremendous burden for community banks while providing little or no incremental benefit to investors or other financial statement users. Community banks would need to implement robust pricing engines and complex valuation methodologies for their mortgage loan portfolios in order to satisfy the valuation standards required in current fair value guidance.

Private Company Council. ICBA is encouraged by the work of the Financial Accounting Foundation to promote a different approach to financial accounting and reporting for private companies, including non-public community banks, by creating the Private Company Council (PCC). The PCC is tasked with identifying current and future accounting standards that should be modified for private companies. Such modifications will help address the current financial reporting burden facing community banks by simplifying reporting requirements and reducing the costs of compliance. ICBA believes that the PCC should become a proactive member of the accounting standard setting process by participating directly with the FASB when a proposed accounting change is considered. A proactive stance by the PCC will help ensure appropriate accommodations are made for community banks when harmful accounting changes are being considered.

Burdens of Accounting Standards. As accounting standards become more complex, there is great merit in looking at whether all aspects of accounting and disclosure standards are necessary for all companies. Accounting standards setters should take greater account of the potential impact of changes to accounting standards on community banks and other small businesses, be they private or public companies, which have fewer resources to cope with them. The costs of accounting changes must not outweigh their benefits. The PCC should become a more proactive partner in the accounting standard setting process to ensure that the burdens on small community banks are adequately addressed and reconciled.

Leases. ICBA opposes balance sheet recognition of operating leases as proposed under the FASB’s re-exposure of the project on leases. Community banks would be required to gross up the balance sheet to record operating lease assets and liabilities. For lessees, the offsetting assets and liabilities would need to be amortized, which would require the implementation of complex methodologies and could result in the need to invest in expensive solutions for banks with extensive leasing transactions.

Liquidity Risk and Interest Rate Risk Disclosures. ICBA strongly opposes the FASB’s proposal to require extensive liquidity risk and interest rate risk disclosures in audited financial statement footnotes. The proposed liquidity gap maturity analysis, repricing gap analysis, and interest rate sensitivity tables would provide very little or no new information that could assist stakeholders in making informed decisions about the health of a community bank. Prudential regulators are tasked with assessing the safety and soundness of the banks they examine, including the assessment of liquidity and interest rate risk.

Staff Contact: James Kendrick

Return to ICBA Policy Resolutions

Stay Connected Facebook Twitter You Tube LinkedIn